UC Berkeley Physics 105 (Analytic Mechanics)
Undergraduate class, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Physics, 2023
- PHYS 105 - Analytic Mechanics (Taylor)
Engaging undergraduate students in training that prepares them for careers outside of my own laboratory is an underlying theme for my classroom — that means incorporating professional skills such as public speaking, technical writing, and outreach to the public are crucial to a successful undergraduate curriculum. Students should be able to ask questions, contribute ideas, provide justification for their responses, and cooperate in teams. With the understanding that not every student in the physics classroom desires a career path in physics, students should emerge from physics courses with some growth as a ‘scientific citizen’. To combat this, students will engage in applications outside of the classroom — ideally related to their chosen field of study — as well as to discuss the real world impact of curriculum topics. Students should be able to communicate their understanding of physics and general scientific knowledge in-class and in professional settings. Finally, students should also become equipped to read and interpret scientific literature; thus, a physics course should emphasize collaboration, creativity, and communication in the sciences.
It has become clear to me that the traditional lecture environment may not adequately prepare students for careers beyond the classroom, unless it is supported by the development of critical thinking and problem-solving techniques. Evidence suggests active learning in the form of group work, peer instruction, and flipped classrooms not only improves student understanding of the curriculum, but also increases persistence in STEM education and careers1. Both group work and the flipped classroom model promote the classroom as a place of communication and collaboration. Recent work also supports the flipped classroom over traditional lectures when in-class time can be devoted to cooperative learning and practical tasks, or other activities aligned with high order thinking skills2.
A quick note on assessments: The difficulty of approaching physics from a communications and collaboration lens is that the traditional model of midterm and final exams do not adequately demonstrate students’ development along the learning objectives. Understandably, there is a desire for a final exam which will provide a single number, an easy metric, to evaluate a students understanding; however, this model leaves behind students who may struggle with written tests (evaluating their test-taking ability regardless of their grasp of the material). In my classroom, students should have a plethora of ways to demonstrate understanding. Additionally, assessments may provide immediate feedback on course or lecture design, which allows for improvement within moments or across several terms — a data-driven instructional design.
The classroom is often the first place a STEM student will be introduced to the physics community, and it is all too often the place where women and historically marginalized communities are discouraged from continuing. My classroom will not contribute to this generational loss of knowledge and curiosity.
Undergraduate class, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Physics, 2023
Undergraduate class , University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Physics, 2013
Undergraduate class, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Physics, 2012
Undergraduate laboratory , Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Physics, 2011
CIRTL Network, 2022
Intensive course designed for future faculty by the University of Florida Center for Teaching Excellence and run through CIRTL. Students will learn how to create a great learning experience for their classrooms while developing a solid foundation of best teaching practices and strategies.
CIRTL Network, 2022
CIRTL students will develop their personal mentoring philosophy, learn how to articulate that philosophy across a variety of disciplines, and refine strategies for dealing with mentoring challenges.
Drexel University, School of Education, 2019
Graduate Minor in STEM education which requires advanced coursework in evidence-based pedagogies and assessment practices. Completed through the Drexel Center for the Advancement of STEM Teaching and Learning Excellence (CASTLE)
CIRTL Network & Drexel University, 2019
Awarded in association with the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), Drexel CIRTL Certificates distinguish emerging leaders in evidence-based teaching practices among future faculty.
CIRTL Network, 2018
Regular engagement with CIRTL ongoing coursework and workshops.
Elaine Seymour and Anne-Barrie Hunter, editors. Talking about Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019 [Available Online Here] ↩ ↩2 ↩3
Hector Galindo-Dominguez. Flipped classroom in the educational system: Trend or effective pedagogical model compared to other methodologies? Educational Technology & Society, 24(3):44–60, 2021 [Available Online Here] ↩
Cissy J. Ballen, Carl Wieman, Shima Salehi, Jeremy B. Searle, and Kelly R. Zamudio. Enhancing Diversity in Undergraduate Science: Self-Efficacy Drives Performance Gains with Active Learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4):ar56 December 2017 ↩
Scott Freeman et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 10(23), 2014 ↩
Karyn L Lewis et al. Fitting in to Move Forward: Belonging, Gender, and Persistence in the Physical Sciences, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(4):420–436, 2017. [Available Online Here] ↩
Benjamin P. Koester, Galina Grom, and Timothy A. McKay. Patterns of Gendered Performance Difference in Introductory STEM Courses. arXiv:1608.07565 [physics], August 2016, 1608.07565 [Available Online Here] ↩
Mary E Piontek. Best Practices for Designing and Grading Exams. CRLT Occasional Papers (University of Michigan), 24:12. [Available Online Here] ↩
Sally S. Scott, Joan M. McGuire, and Teresa E. Foley. Universal Design for Instruction: A Framework for Anticipating and Responding to Disability and Other Diverse Learning Needs in the College Classroom. Equity & Excellence in Education, 36(1):40–49, January 2003 [Available Online Here] ↩