Teaching

Instructional Approach

Scientific Citizenship

Engaging undergraduate students in training that prepares them for careers outside of my own laboratory is an underlying theme for my classroom — that means incorporating professional skills such as public speaking, technical writing, and outreach to the public are crucial to a successful undergraduate curriculum. Students should be able to ask questions, contribute ideas, provide justification for their responses, and cooperate in teams. With the understanding that not every student in the physics classroom desires a career path in physics, students should emerge from physics courses with some growth as a ‘scientific citizen’. To combat this, students will engage in applications outside of the classroom — ideally related to their chosen field of study — as well as to discuss the real world impact of curriculum topics. Students should be able to communicate their understanding of physics and general scientific knowledge in-class and in professional settings. Finally, students should also become equipped to read and interpret scientific literature; thus, a physics course should emphasize collaboration, creativity, and communication in the sciences.


Research-Driven Pedagogy

It has become clear to me that the traditional lecture environment may not adequately prepare students for careers beyond the classroom, unless it is supported by the development of critical thinking and problem-solving techniques. Evidence suggests active learning in the form of group work, peer instruction, and flipped classrooms not only improves student understanding of the curriculum, but also increases persistence in STEM education and careers1. Both group work and the flipped classroom model promote the classroom as a place of communication and collaboration. Recent work also supports the flipped classroom over traditional lectures when in-class time can be devoted to cooperative learning and practical tasks, or other activities aligned with high order thinking skills2.

A quick note on assessments: The difficulty of approaching physics from a communications and collaboration lens is that the traditional model of midterm and final exams do not adequately demonstrate students’ development along the learning objectives. Understandably, there is a desire for a final exam which will provide a single number, an easy metric, to evaluate a students understanding; however, this model leaves behind students who may struggle with written tests (evaluating their test-taking ability regardless of their grasp of the material). In my classroom, students should have a plethora of ways to demonstrate understanding. Additionally, assessments may provide immediate feedback on course or lecture design, which allows for improvement within moments or across several terms — a data-driven instructional design.


Inclusion and Accessibility

The classroom is often the first place a STEM student will be introduced to the physics community, and it is all too often the place where women and historically marginalized communities are discouraged from continuing. My classroom will not contribute to this generational loss of knowledge and curiosity.





Instructional Experience

UCLA Graduate Teaching Assistant

Undergraduate class , University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Physics, 2013

  • PHYS 6A - Physics for Life Sciences Majors: Mechanics (now PHYSICS 5A) (Giancoli)
  • PHYS 17 - Introduction to Quantum Mechanics and Statistical Mechanics (Serway / Moses / Moyer)

RPI Graduate Teaching Assistant

Undergraduate class, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Physics, 2012

  • PHYS 2510 (now 2210): Quantum Physics I (Townsend)
  • PHYS 4100: Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Griffiths)

RPI Laboratory Facilitator

Undergraduate laboratory , Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Physics, 2011

  • PHYS 1150: Honors Physics I (Halliday / Resnick / Krane)
  • PHYS 1250: Honors Physics II (Halliday / Resnick / Krane)



Instructional Coursework and Certification

Research Mentor Training

CIRTL Network, 2022

CIRTL students will develop their personal mentoring philosophy, learn how to articulate that philosophy across a variety of disciplines, and refine strategies for dealing with mentoring challenges.

Drexel CIRTL Associate Certificate

CIRTL Network & Drexel University, 2019

Awarded in association with the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL), Drexel CIRTL Certificates distinguish emerging leaders in evidence-based teaching practices among future faculty.



  1. Elaine Seymour and Anne-Barrie Hunter, editors. Talking about Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019 [Available Online Here 2 3

  2. Hector Galindo-Dominguez. Flipped classroom in the educational system: Trend or effective pedagogical model compared to other methodologies? Educational Technology & Society, 24(3):44–60, 2021 [Available Online Here

  3. Cissy J. Ballen, Carl Wieman, Shima Salehi, Jeremy B. Searle, and Kelly R. Zamudio. Enhancing Diversity in Undergraduate Science: Self-Efficacy Drives Performance Gains with Active Learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4):ar56 December 2017 

  4. Scott Freeman et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 10(23), 2014 

  5. Karyn L Lewis et al. Fitting in to Move Forward: Belonging, Gender, and Persistence in the Physical Sciences, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(4):420–436, 2017. [Available Online Here

  6. Benjamin P. Koester, Galina Grom, and Timothy A. McKay. Patterns of Gendered Performance Difference in Introductory STEM Courses. arXiv:1608.07565 [physics], August 2016, 1608.07565 [Available Online Here

  7. Mary E Piontek. Best Practices for Designing and Grading Exams. CRLT Occasional Papers (University of Michigan), 24:12. [Available Online Here

  8. Sally S. Scott, Joan M. McGuire, and Teresa E. Foley. Universal Design for Instruction: A Framework for Anticipating and Responding to Disability and Other Diverse Learning Needs in the College Classroom. Equity & Excellence in Education, 36(1):40–49, January 2003 [Available Online Here